Sunday, July 27, 2008

How Bad Is The Hanimex?

Compared my (badly) repaired Hong Kong Hanimex 135mm f/2.8 with the famous Pentax SMC-M 135mm f/3.5 at comparable apertures.








f/2.8f/4f/5.6
Hanimex
Pentax


The original photo:



As expected, at f/2.8 it's pretty bad, getting better as I stop down. Of course the Pentax shows no image at f/2.8 so even a bad image is better than nothing. Peak performance is obtained at f/8, degrading due to diffraction at f/11.

The Pentax is better at all apertures except f/2.8 (obviously). It also exhibits higher contrast, almost certainly due to the better coatings. It did cost me $40 on ebay (as opposed to $1.00). However when factoring in the cost of shipping, the Pentax is "only" four times more expensive (about $60 versus $15). Is it worth it? of course. But sometimes you need the faster aperture.

0 comments: